State v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Fisher

304 N.W.2d 33, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1238

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 3, 1981

Docket81-134

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 304 N.W.2d 33 (State v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1238 (Mich. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 29.03, from an order of the district court suppressing evidence in the prosecution of defendant for burglary and assault. Defendant is a juvenile who was certified for adult prosecution. The issues on appeal concern the admissibility of certain statements defendant made to the police and a gun found as the result of one of these statements. We do not address these issues on this expedited appeal because the state has failed to demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that the suppression order will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035, 100 S.Ct. 709, 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980); State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 29.03, from an order of the district court suppressing evidence in the prosecution of defendant for burglary and assault. Defendant is a juvenile who was certified for adult prosecution. The issues on appeal concern the admissibility of certain statements defendant made to the police and a gun found as the result of one of these statements. We do not address these issues on this expedited appeal because the state has failed to demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that the suppression order will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035, 100 S.Ct. 709, 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980); State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 N.W.2d 33, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fisher-minn-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack