State v. Fisher

304 N.W.2d 33, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1238
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 3, 1981·No. 81-134·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 29.03, from an order of the district court suppressing evidence in the prosecution of defendant for burglary and assault. Defendant is a juvenile who was certified for adult prosecution. The issues on appeal concern the admissibility of certain statements defendant made to the police and a gun found as the result of one of these statements. We do not address these issues on this expedited appeal because the state has failed to demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that the suppression order will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035, 100 S.Ct. 709, 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980); State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1238 (Mich. 1981).

304 N.W.2d 33 (State v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Eisenbacher
368 N.W.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1985)
State v. Kisse
351 N.W.2d 97 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Pelovsky
347 N.W.2d 529 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
State v. Schmieg
344 N.W.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)