Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Fischer

State v. Fischer

123 Ohio St. 3d 1410
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 2009
Docket2009-0897
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 123 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (State v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fischer, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

Summit App. No. 24406, 2009-Ohio-1491.

On motion for reconsideration. The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. The Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, and the parties shall brief this ease in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., would grant the motion as to all Propositions of Law. Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would deny the motion for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Harris
2011 Ohio 1626 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Fischer
2010 Ohio 6238 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
State ex rel. Stanley v. D'Apolito
2010 Ohio 4850 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 Ohio St. 3d 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fischer-ohio-2009.