State v. Fischer
118 A. 927, 98 N.J.L. 293, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 302
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Fischer, 118 A. 927, 98 N.J.L. 293, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 302 (N.J. 1922).
118 A. 927 (State v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Blum
35 Cal. App. 3d 515 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
State v. Palmieri
64 A.2d 629 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
In Re Berry
88 P.2d 427 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)