State v. First National Bank

4 Nev. 491
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1868·No. No. 3·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

By the Court,

Whitman, J.

Appellants object to the judgment rendered on default. First, that the complaint does not show a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff.” Second, that “ the real parties in interest are the inhab-[492]*492Rants of Austin School District, and the action should have been prosecuted in the name of the Trustees of said District.”

The action is brought under the “ Act to provide'for the maintenance and supervision of public schools,” approved March 20th, 1865, and the plaintiff is.as prescribed by the thirty-fifth section thereof. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. First National Bank, 4 Nev. 491 (Neb. 1868).

4 Nev. 491 (State v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosum v. Hodges
9 L.R.A. 817 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)