State v. First Bank Stock Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. First Bank Stock Corporation

270 N.W. 574, 198 Minn. 619, 1936 Minn. LEXIS 803

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 11, 1936

DocketNo. 31,234.

StatusPublished

This text of 270 N.W. 574 (State v. First Bank Stock Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. First Bank Stock Corporation, 270 N.W. 574, 198 Minn. 619, 1936 Minn. LEXIS 803 (Mich. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

*620 Pee. Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Hennepin county adjudging in substance that the state of Minnesota is entitled to collect a tax levied and assessed by it upon shares of stock owned by the appellant, a Delaware corporation, in banks organized under the laws of the states of Montana and North Dakota. The questions presented are those decided by this court on the former appeal in the same cause taken by the state from an order denying the state’s motion for amended findings and conclusions or for a new trial, as reported in 197 Minn. 544, 267 N. W. 519, 269 N. W. 37.

For the reasons stated in the former opinions, the judgment entered in the district court is hereby in all things affirmed.

The parties having stipulated that no remittitur issue if the judgment below be affirmed, the clerk will enter final judgment in this court in accordance with the provisions of Rule XX.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*620 Pee. Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Hennepin county adjudging in substance that the state of Minnesota is entitled to collect a tax levied and assessed by it upon shares of stock owned by the appellant, a Delaware corporation, in banks organized under the laws of the states of Montana and North Dakota. The questions presented are those decided by this court on the former appeal in the same cause taken by the state from an order denying the state’s motion for amended findings and conclusions or for a new trial, as reported in 197 Minn. 544, 267 N. W. 519, 269 N. W. 37.

For the reasons stated in the former opinions, the judgment entered in the district court is hereby in all things affirmed.

The parties having stipulated that no remittitur issue if the judgment below be affirmed, the clerk will enter final judgment in this court in accordance with the provisions of Rule XX.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 N.W. 574, 198 Minn. 619, 1936 Minn. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-first-bank-stock-corporation-minn-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack