State v. Finger

104 Ohio St. 3d 157
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 8, 2004·No. No. 2003-0396·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County certified the following issue to this court:

{¶2} “Whether, when a trial court fails to notify an offender at plea or sentencing of mandatory post-release control, a reviewing court should reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing that includes the post-release control advisory or find that the defendant’s prison sentence does not include post-release control.”

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

{¶ 3} On the authority of State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21, 2004-Ohio-6085, 817 N.E.2d 864, we answer affirmatively to the first alternative in the certified issue.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Finger, 104 Ohio St. 3d 157 (Ohio 2004).

104 Ohio St. 3d 157 (State v. Finger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Greitzer, Unpublished Decision (8-5-2005)
2005 Ohio 4037 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Parrett, Unpublished Decision (2-14-2005)
2005 Ohio 557 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)