State v. Finerson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Finerson

477 S.W.3d 1, 2015 WL 1813031

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 2015·No. No. ED 101005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony Finerson appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his plea of guilty after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts- and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony Finerson appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his plea of guilty after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts- and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Finerson, 477 S.W.3d 1, 2015 WL 1813031 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

477 S.W.3d 1 (State v. Finerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.