Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Finan

State v. Finan

851 A.2d 304, 269 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 5, 2004
DocketSC 17185
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 851 A.2d 304 (State v. Finan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Finan, 851 A.2d 304, 269 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 209 (Colo. 2004).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 222 (AC 21737), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court properly admitted the lay opinion testimony of the police officers as to the identification of the defendant on the convenience store surveillance videotape?”
[902]*902Decided May 5, 2004 Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition. Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Finan
881 A.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
851 A.2d 304, 269 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-finan-conn-2004.