State v. Finan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Finan

851 A.2d 304, 269 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 209

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 5, 2004·No. SC 17185·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 222 (AC 21737), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court properly admitted the lay opinion testimony of the police officers as to the identification of the defendant on the convenience store surveillance videotape?”

[902] Decided May 5, 2004 Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition. Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 222 (AC 21737), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court properly admitted the lay opinion testimony of the police officers as to the identification of the defendant on the convenience store surveillance videotape?”

[902] Decided May 5, 2004 Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition. Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

State v. Finan, 851 A.2d 304, 269 Conn. 901, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 209 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

851 A.2d 304 (State v. Finan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related