State v. Filieo
This text of 538 A.2d 772 (State v. Filieo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
David Filieo appeals the judgment of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County) affirming the District Court (Lewiston) judgment that he had violated 22 M.R.S.A. § 2383 (1980) (civil possession of marijuana). Contrary to Filieo’s only contention on appeal, we conclude that the motion judge’s finding that the police officer had a reasonable and articulable suspicion sufficient to justify an investigatory stop was not clearly erroneous. See State v. Cyr, 501 A.2d 1303, 1305-06 (Me.1985); State v. Chapman, 495 A.2d 314, 317-18 (Me.1985).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
538 A.2d 772, 1988 Me. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-filieo-me-1988.