State v. Fields

487 S.W.3d 513, 2016 WL 1642568, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 407
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 26, 2016
DocketWD 78088
StatusPublished

This text of 487 S.W.3d 513 (State v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fields, 487 S.W.3d 513, 2016 WL 1642568, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 407 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Joshua Fields appeals from his convictions for attempted first-degree robbery, kidnapping, and two counts of armed criminal action. He contends the circuit court erred in allowing the State to admit a portion of his accomplice’s videotaped statement to police because the statement improperly bolstered the accomplice’s trial testimony. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a published opinion.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 S.W.3d 513, 2016 WL 1642568, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fields-moctapp-2016.