State v. Fields

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Fields

948 S.W.2d 201, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 1997 WL 351782

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 27, 1997

DocketNo. 70742

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 948 S.W.2d 201 (State v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fields, 948 S.W.2d 201, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 1997 WL 351782 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ardell Fields, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape, RSMo section 566.030 (1994), resisting arrest, RSMo section 575.150 (1994), and assault in the third degree, RSMo section 565.070 (1994). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of [202]*202conviction is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ardell Fields, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape, RSMo section 566.030 (1994), resisting arrest, RSMo section 575.150 (1994), and assault in the third degree, RSMo section 565.070 (1994). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of [202]*202conviction is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

948 S.W.2d 201, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 1997 WL 351782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fields-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack