State v. Festervand

179 So. 297, 189 La. 226, 1938 La. LEXIS 1170
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 7, 1938
DocketNo. 34694.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 179 So. 297 (State v. Festervand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Festervand, 179 So. 297, 189 La. 226, 1938 La. LEXIS 1170 (La. 1938).

Opinion

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The defendant is appealing from a conviction and sentence for the crime of grand larceny, and for being a second offender. There is no hill of exception nor assignment of error, and no error apparent on the face of the record; hence no ground for the defendant’s asking for an annulment of the conviction or sentence.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Honeycutt
49 So. 2d 610 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
State v. Calvin
24 So. 2d 467 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1945)
State v. Carlson
188 So. 155 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 So. 297, 189 La. 226, 1938 La. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-festervand-la-1938.