State v. Festervand
179 So. 297, 189 La. 226, 1938 La. LEXIS 1170
Opinion
The defendant is appealing from a conviction and sentence for the crime of grand larceny, and for being a second offender. There is no hill of exception nor assignment of error, and no error apparent on the face of the record; hence no ground for the defendant’s asking for an annulment of the conviction or sentence.
The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Festervand, 179 So. 297, 189 La. 226, 1938 La. LEXIS 1170 (La. 1938).
179 So. 297 (State v. Festervand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Honeycutt
49 So. 2d 610 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
State v. Calvin
24 So. 2d 467 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1945)
State v. Carlson
188 So. 155 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1939)