State v. Fesperman
141 S.E.2d 252, 264 N.C. 168, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1143
This text of 141 S.E.2d 252 (State v. Fesperman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Fesperman, 141 S.E.2d 252, 264 N.C. 168, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1143 (N.C. 1965).
Opinion
On authority of S. v. Hord, ante 149, we hold that a duly appointed policeman of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, is an officer of said City within the meaning of G.S. 14-230.
The ruling of the court below, quashing these bills of indictment, will be upheld for the reasons stated in the case of S. v. Stogner, filed this day, ante 163.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
141 S.E.2d 252, 264 N.C. 168, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fesperman-nc-1965.