State v. Ferras

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Ferras

467 So. 2d 765, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 914, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13404

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1985

DocketNo. 84-950

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 467 So. 2d 765 (State v. Ferras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ferras, 467 So. 2d 765, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 914, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand upon the authority of Jenkins v. State, 389 So.2d 971 (Fla. 1980). Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(g) calls for a ninety-day extension, beginning on receipt of the mandate, and is equally applicable whether the state or defendant brings the interlocutory appeal and regardless of whether the appeal succeeds or fails. Absent the rule, a ninety-day extension is appropriate in all such eases. See Jenkins, supra, and numerous district court opinions, e.g., State v. McQuay, 423 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The trial court’s initial order, granting the ninety-day extension, which it was later persuaded to withdraw, was correct.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and BARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand upon the authority of Jenkins v. State, 389 So.2d 971 (Fla. 1980). Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(g) calls for a ninety-day extension, beginning on receipt of the mandate, and is equally applicable whether the state or defendant brings the interlocutory appeal and regardless of whether the appeal succeeds or fails. Absent the rule, a ninety-day extension is appropriate in all such eases. See Jenkins, supra, and numerous district court opinions, e.g., State v. McQuay, 423 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The trial court’s initial order, granting the ninety-day extension, which it was later persuaded to withdraw, was correct.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and BARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 So. 2d 765, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 914, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ferras-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack