State v. Fernando V.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Fernando V.

155 A.3d 753, 324 Conn. 923, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 63

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Fernando V.. Read the opinion of the Court — 331 Conn. 201 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 15, 2017·Published

Opinion

Mary A. Beattie, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 170 Conn.App. 44, 153 A.3d 701 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court err in holding that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of the victim's boyfriend on the issue of whether she had exhibited behaviors associated with some sexual assault victims?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary A. Beattie, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 170 Conn.App. 44, 153 A.3d 701 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court err in holding that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of the victim's boyfriend on the issue of whether she had exhibited behaviors associated with some sexual assault victims?

State v. Fernando V., 155 A.3d 753, 324 Conn. 923, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 63 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

155 A.3d 753 (State v. Fernando V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related