State v. Fernando V.
This text of 155 A.3d 753 (State v. Fernando V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary A. Beattie, assigned counsel, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Did the Appellate Court err in holding that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of the victim's boyfriend on the issue of whether she had exhibited behaviors associated with some sexual assault victims?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 A.3d 753, 324 Conn. 923, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fernando-v-conn-2017.