State v. Ferguson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Ferguson

711 N.E.2d 1013, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2265

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 30, 1999

Docket99-732

StatusPublished

This text of 711 N.E.2d 1013 (State v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ferguson, 711 N.E.2d 1013, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2265 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0021. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97—L—191; briefing schedule stayed.

Discretionary appeals in the following causes are allowed; sua sponte, the causes are consolidated with 99-732, supra, and held for the decision in 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97-L-191; briefing schedule stayed: 99-736, State v. Hollis, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0020; 99-737, State v. Prisco, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0015; 99-738, State v. Lynch, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0013; 99-739, State v. Moore, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0030; 99-740, State v. Miller, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0024; 99-741, State v. Whitsell, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0025; 99-742, State v. Sanders, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0022; 99-743, State v. Mitcham, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0017; 99-744, State v. Loudenback, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0023; 99-745, State v. McNutt, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0014; 99-746, State v. Vigilante, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0029; 99-747, State v. Morris, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0018; 99-748, State v. Lemmon, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0028; 99-749, State v. Luther, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0016; and 99-750, State v. Keig, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0021. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97—L—191; briefing schedule stayed.

Discretionary appeals in the following causes are allowed; sua sponte, the causes are consolidated with 99-732, supra, and held for the decision in 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97-L-191; briefing schedule stayed: 99-736, State v. Hollis, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0020; 99-737, State v. Prisco, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0015; 99-738, State v. Lynch, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0013; 99-739, State v. Moore, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0030; 99-740, State v. Miller, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0024; 99-741, State v. Whitsell, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0025; 99-742, State v. Sanders, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0022; 99-743, State v. Mitcham, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0017; 99-744, State v. Loudenback, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0023; 99-745, State v. McNutt, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0014; 99-746, State v. Vigilante, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0029; 99-747, State v. Morris, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0018; 99-748, State v. Lemmon, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0028; 99-749, State v. Luther, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0016; and 99-750, State v. Keig, Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0019.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 N.E.2d 1013, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ferguson-ohio-1999.