State v. Fensom

103 S.W.3d 835, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 398, 2003 WL 1477819
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2003·No. WD 61318·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred G. Fensom appeals the order of the Circuit Court of Clay County overruling his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to one count of forgery, § 570.090.1(1). As a result of his conviction, the appellant was sentenced to four years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

In the appellant’s sole point on appeal, he claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to forgery because his guilty plea was not entered voluntarily and intelligently in that it was induced by a misrepresentation of plea counsel that the State would recommend he receive a suspended imposition of sentence.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fensom, 103 S.W.3d 835, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 398, 2003 WL 1477819 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

103 S.W.3d 835 (State v. Fensom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fensom v. Kempker
151 S.W.3d 115 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)