State v. Fenn
85 A. 454, 83 N.J.L. 794, 54 Vroom 794, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 239
Opinion
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Kallsoh, Bogert, Vrk-DENBURGH, CONGBON, WHITE, TREACY, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Fenn, 85 A. 454, 83 N.J.L. 794, 54 Vroom 794, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1912).
85 A. 454 (State v. Fenn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.