State v. Fendler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Fendler

277 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2009 WL 596469

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 10, 2009

DocketED 90940

StatusPublished

This text of 277 S.W.3d 893 (State v. Fendler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fendler, 277 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2009 WL 596469 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy Fendler, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of felony stealing. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred in admitting certain evidence.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy Fendler, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of felony stealing. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred in admitting certain evidence.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2009 WL 596469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fendler-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack