State v. Fendler
277 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2009 WL 596469
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant, Timothy Fendler, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of felony stealing. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred in admitting certain evidence.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Fendler, 277 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2009 WL 596469 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
277 S.W.3d 893 (State v. Fendler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lynn v. Missouri Veterans Commission
277 S.W.3d 893 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)