State v. Felton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Felton

173 S.W.3d 926, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1533, 2005 WL 2746653

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2005

DocketED 85011

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 S.W.3d 926 (State v. Felton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Felton, 173 S.W.3d 926, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1533, 2005 WL 2746653 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

*927 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant/Appellant Louis Felton (“Fel-ton”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, after a jury found him guilty, as a prior and persistent offender, of Second-Degree Trafficking, a Class A felony, in violation of Section 195.223 RSMo. (2000). Following Felton’s conviction, the Honorable Michael B. Calvin sentenced him to twelve years of imprisonment, without the possibility of probation or parole.

No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is AFFIRMED pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*927 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant/Appellant Louis Felton (“Fel-ton”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, after a jury found him guilty, as a prior and persistent offender, of Second-Degree Trafficking, a Class A felony, in violation of Section 195.223 RSMo. (2000). Following Felton’s conviction, the Honorable Michael B. Calvin sentenced him to twelve years of imprisonment, without the possibility of probation or parole.

No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is AFFIRMED pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 S.W.3d 926, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1533, 2005 WL 2746653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-felton-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack