State v. Feducia
This text of 70 So. 1010 (State v. Feducia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The accused, convicted of having sold intoxicating liquors without a [975]*975license, lias appealed from a refusal to grant him a new trial which he asked for in order to have an opportunity to impeach the two state witnesses upon whose testimony he was convicted, by producing two witnesses, newly discovered, who would testify that the two state witnesses were of bad repute, because engaged in the sale of whisky without a license, which fact the newly discovered witnesses knew because they themselves had bought whisky from them.
Impeaching testimony is no ground for a new trial. State v. Young, 107 La. 619, 31 South. 993.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 So. 1010, 138 La. 974, 1916 La. LEXIS 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-feducia-la-1916.