State v. Federico

394 P.2d 211, 96 Ariz. 281, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 281
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 13, 1964
DocketNo. 1286
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 394 P.2d 211 (State v. Federico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Federico, 394 P.2d 211, 96 Ariz. 281, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 281 (Ark. 1964).

Opinion

LOCKWOOD, Vice Chief Justice:

This case arose out of the same incident related in No. 1281, State v. Owen, 94 Ariz. 404, 385 P.2d 700 (1963). The mandate of this Court issued November 29, 1963, 94 Ariz. 413, 385 P.2d 706, affirmed the judgment of the lower court for the reasons stated in Owen.

In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ordering the judgment of this Court in this case vacated, and for the reasons set forth in our decision in accord therewith, State v. Owen, 96 Ariz. 274, 394 P.2d 206 (1964), the former mandate herein is set aside and the case is reversed and remanded for new trial not inconsistent with the rules set forth therein.

UDALL, C. J., and JENNINGS, J., concur. STRUCKMEYER and BERNSTEIN, Justices.

We concur in the foregoing decision. For the reasons stated and for the further reasons expressed in our dissents in State v. Owen, 94 Ariz. 412, 385 P.2d 705, we believe this case should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Owen
416 P.2d 589 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 P.2d 211, 96 Ariz. 281, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-federico-ariz-1964.