State v. Federico
This text of 394 P.2d 211 (State v. Federico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case arose out of the same incident related in No. 1281, State v. Owen, 94 Ariz. 404, 385 P.2d 700 (1963). The mandate of this Court issued November 29, 1963, 94 Ariz. 413, 385 P.2d 706, affirmed the judgment of the lower court for the reasons stated in Owen.
In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ordering the judgment of this Court in this case vacated, and for the reasons set forth in our decision in accord therewith, State v. Owen, 96 Ariz. 274, 394 P.2d 206 (1964), the former mandate herein is set aside and the case is reversed and remanded for new trial not inconsistent with the rules set forth therein.
We concur in the foregoing decision. For the reasons stated and for the further reasons expressed in our dissents in State v. Owen, 94 Ariz. 412, 385 P.2d 705, we believe this case should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
394 P.2d 211, 96 Ariz. 281, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-federico-ariz-1964.