State v. FAVOCCIA

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. FAVOCCIA

989 A.2d 604, 295 Conn. 909, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 86

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 25, 2010·No. SC 18559·Published

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 1 (AC 30266), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting four statements of an expert into evidence and, if so, did the Appellate Court properly determine that the error in admitting those statements was harmful?”

*910 Adam E. Mattei, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Gary A. Mastronardi, in opposition. Decided February 25, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 1 (AC 30266), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting four statements of an expert into evidence and, if so, did the Appellate Court properly determine that the error in admitting those statements was harmful?”

*910 Adam E. Mattei, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Gary A. Mastronardi, in opposition. Decided February 25, 2010

State v. FAVOCCIA, 989 A.2d 604, 295 Conn. 909, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 86 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

989 A.2d 604 (State v. FAVOCCIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related