Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. FAVOCCIA

State v. FAVOCCIA

989 A.2d 604, 295 Conn. 909, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 86
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 25, 2010
DocketSC 18559
StatusPublished

This text of 989 A.2d 604 (State v. FAVOCCIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. FAVOCCIA, 989 A.2d 604, 295 Conn. 909, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 86 (Colo. 2010).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 1 (AC 30266), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting four statements of an expert into evidence and, if so, did the Appellate Court properly determine that the error in admitting those statements was harmful?”

*910 Adam E. Mattei, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Gary A. Mastronardi, in opposition. Decided February 25, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. FAVOCCIA
986 A.2d 1081 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
989 A.2d 604, 295 Conn. 909, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-favoccia-conn-2010.