State v. Fausel

959 A.2d 1007, 289 Conn. 940
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 20, 2008
Docket18249
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 959 A.2d 1007 (State v. Fausel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fausel, 959 A.2d 1007, 289 Conn. 940 (Colo. 2008).

Opinion

959 A.2d 1007 (2008)
289 Conn. 940

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Kenneth E. FAUSEL.

No. 18249.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 20, 2008.

Bruce R. Lockwood, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Steven B. Rasile, special public defender, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn.App. 820, 953 A.2d 891 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's suppression ruling that the police were justified in entering the defendant's house without a warrant?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18249.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fausel
993 A.2d 455 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
959 A.2d 1007, 289 Conn. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fausel-conn-2008.