State v. Faunce

76 P.3d 677, 189 Or. App. 526, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1309
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 17, 2003·No. 020942M; A119080·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on one count of disorderly conduct. ORS 166.025. He assigns error to the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying the motion. We accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Faunce, 76 P.3d 677, 189 Or. App. 526, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1309 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

76 P.3d 677 (State v. Faunce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 166.025
Oregon § 166.025