State v. Faunce
76 P.3d 677, 189 Or. App. 526, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1309
This text of 76 P.3d 677 (State v. Faunce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Faunce, 76 P.3d 677, 189 Or. App. 526, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1309 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on one count of disorderly conduct. ORS 166.025. He assigns error to the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying the motion. We accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 166.025
Oregon § 166.025
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 P.3d 677, 189 Or. App. 526, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-faunce-orctapp-2003.