State v. . Faulkner

114 S.E. 690, 184 N.C. 632, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 152
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. . Faulkner. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 N.C. 635
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 29, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

The jury found the defendant guilty of having spirituous liquor in his possession for the purpose of sale, and of receiving at *633 one time spirituous liquor in a quantity greater than one quart, in violation of C. S., 3379 and 3385. Tbe defendant excepted to tbe court’s refusal to dismiss tbe action as in case of nonsuit, and to tbe instruction that if tbe jury were satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that tbe defendant bad on band for tbe purpose of sale “one gallon, or any other amount, of spirituous liquor” tbey should find tbe defendant guilty of a violation of section 3379.

We concur in bis Honor’s decision. Neither exception can be sustained.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Faulkner, 114 S.E. 690, 184 N.C. 632, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 152 (N.C. 1922).

114 S.E. 690 (State v. . Faulkner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.