State v. Farris
178 S.E.2d 29, 10 N.C. App. 188, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Farris. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.C. App. 143 →
Opinion
The defendant assigns as error that he did not receive a sentence the same as the sentence imposed upon one of the co-conspirators. There is no merit in this assignment of error. State v. Garris, 265 N.C. 711, 144 S.E. 2d 901 (1965).
We have reviewed the record in this case and find no prejudicial error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Farris, 178 S.E.2d 29, 10 N.C. App. 188, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1233 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).
178 S.E.2d 29 (State v. Farris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Garris
144 S.E.2d 901 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)