State v. Farrell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Farrell

413 S.W.3d 30, 2013 WL 5797650, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1283

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2013·No. No. WD 75050·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Gail Farrell appeals from her conviction of one count of possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine, in violation of § 195.202. Upon review of the briefs and the record on appeal, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Gail Farrell appeals from her conviction of one count of possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine, in violation of § 195.202. Upon review of the briefs and the record on appeal, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Farrell, 413 S.W.3d 30, 2013 WL 5797650, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1283 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 30 (State v. Farrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.