State v. Farrell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Farrell

384 S.W.3d 237, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 983, 2012 WL 3291874

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 2012·No. No. ED 97059·Published

Opinion

[238] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lamar Farrell appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second-degree assault, Section 565.020 RSMo 2000, and first-degree tampering, Section 569.080 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[238] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lamar Farrell appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second-degree assault, Section 565.020 RSMo 2000, and first-degree tampering, Section 569.080 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Farrell, 384 S.W.3d 237, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 983, 2012 WL 3291874 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

384 S.W.3d 237 (State v. Farrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.