State v. Farrar
This text of 38 Mo. 457 (State v. Farrar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
There are several points raised by the bill of exceptions and brief in this case, only one of which it is deemed necessary to consider. The appellant was indicted in the Bol-linger Circuit Court for robbery in the first degree. There was but one count and one offence charged. There was a trial had and conviction for robbery in the second degree. The distinction between these two offences under our statute hap been well defined by a former decision of this [458]*458court in the case of State v. Jenkins, 36 Mo. 372. It is very clear that a conviction cannot be had, nor judgment given, for robbery in the second degree, where the charge is robbery in the first degree. The reasons given in the determination of the case referred to are adopted here as being sufficient to authorize the reversal of this case, it being directly in point.
the judgment will, be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Mo. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-farrar-mo-1866.