State v. Farrar

536 A.2d 1113, 1988 Me. LEXIS 15
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided February 2, 1988·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Donald Farrar appeals the judgment entered by the Superior Court, Penobscot County, on his conviction after a jury-waived trial of eight counts of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253 (1983). Contrary to his contentions, the State was not required to prove the exact date of the charged offenses, State v. Greene, 512 A.2d 330, 333 (Me.1986), and the record supports the court’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged offenses occurred within six years prior to the date of the indictment. See State v. Borucki, 505 A.2d 89, 91 (Me.1986).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Farrar, 536 A.2d 1113, 1988 Me. LEXIS 15 (Me. 1988).

536 A.2d 1113 (State v. Farrar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Greene
512 A.2d 330 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)
State v. Borucki
505 A.2d 89 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)