State v. Farrar
This text of 536 A.2d 1113 (State v. Farrar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Donald Farrar appeals the judgment entered by the Superior Court, Penobscot County, on his conviction after a jury-waived trial of eight counts of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253 (1983). Contrary to his contentions, the State was not required to prove the exact date of the charged offenses, State v. Greene, 512 A.2d 330, 333 (Me.1986), and the record supports the court’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged offenses occurred within six years prior to the date of the indictment. See State v. Borucki, 505 A.2d 89, 91 (Me.1986).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
536 A.2d 1113, 1988 Me. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-farrar-me-1988.