State v. Farrall
This text of 807 So. 2d 151 (State v. Farrall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
David FARRALL, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Celia A. Terenzio and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
John H. Pelzer, Bruce D. Udolf and Fabienne E. Leconte of Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The state seeks certiorari review of the trial court's order which in effect precludes it from proceeding under an alternative theory of DUI manslaughter. The theory at issue is driving with an unlawful blood alcohol level (UBAL).
We grant the petition based on the reasoning set forth in this court's recent decision in Dodge v. State, 805 So.2d 990 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Dodge.
KLEIN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
807 So. 2d 151, 2002 WL 181045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-farrall-fladistctapp-2002.