State v. Farragut Nursing Home

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State v. Farragut Nursing Home

99 A.D.2d 776, 471 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17160

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 776 (State v. Farragut Nursing Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Farragut Nursing Home, 99 A.D.2d 776, 471 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover funds disbursed by the plaintiff to the defendants, defendant Herbert Tuchman appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Composto, J.), dated February 17,1983, which denied his motion for renewal and reargument of a decision of the same court dated October 25, 1982, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and (2), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated March 10, 1983, as granted that branch of plaintiff’s motion as sought summary judgment against him. Defendant Tuchman’s notice of appeal is also deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from so [777]*777much of a judgment of the same court, entered June 28,1983, as is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $64,452 (CPLR 5520, subd [c]). Appeal from the order dated February 17,1983 dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying renewal or reargument of a decision. Appeal from the order dated March 10,1983, dismissed. (See Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241,248.) Judgment entered June 28, 1983 affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur. [116 Misc 2d 437.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover funds disbursed by the plaintiff to the defendants, defendant Herbert Tuchman appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Composto, J.), dated February 17,1983, which denied his motion for renewal and reargument of a decision of the same court dated October 25, 1982, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and (2), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated March 10, 1983, as granted that branch of plaintiff’s motion as sought summary judgment against him. Defendant Tuchman’s notice of appeal is also deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from so [777]*777much of a judgment of the same court, entered June 28,1983, as is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $64,452 (CPLR 5520, subd [c]). Appeal from the order dated February 17,1983 dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying renewal or reargument of a decision. Appeal from the order dated March 10,1983, dismissed. (See Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241,248.) Judgment entered June 28, 1983 affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur. [116 Misc 2d 437.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 776, 471 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-farragut-nursing-home-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack