State v. Farr

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Farr

313 S.W.3d 235, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 797, 2010 WL 2378922

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 2010

DocketED 93067

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 313 S.W.3d 235 (State v. Farr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Farr, 313 S.W.3d 235, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 797, 2010 WL 2378922 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Charles Farr (Defendant) of two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy. Defendant appeals on the grounds that the trial court abused its discretion when it allowed the State to submit a substitute information in lieu of indictment on the morning of trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI