State v. Farr
This text of 74 S.W. 834 (State v. Farr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant in this case, Samuel Parr, was indicted by the grand jury in the Buchanan County Criminal Court on the 26th day of June, 1901. The indictment contained two counts: one charged a felonious wounding with a deadly weapon; the other was predicated upon section 1849, Eevised Statutes 1899, and charged that defendant, through culpable negligence, with a deadly and dangerous weapon,maimed, wounded and disfigured, one Ada Sprangler.
Defendant waived formal arraignment; was tried and convicted of the offense as charged in the second count of the indictment, and his punishment assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars. Prom this judgment defendant appealed.
Appellant failed to file any bill of exceptions, preserving any errors of which he may have supposed he had the right to complain. Hence, upon this appeal, there is nothing before us for review, except the record proper. We have carefully examined the indictment, and find that it conforms to the approved precedents, - and that it properly charges all the elements constituting the offense charged. . The record, discloses that the trial proceeded in regular order and the defendant was convicted.
Upon a careful inspection of the entire record, we find no error and the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 S.W. 834, 174 Mo. 362, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-farr-mo-1903.