State v. Faraj

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Faraj

2010 Ohio 6333, 128 Ohio St. 3d 233

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 2010·No. 2010-1679·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-6320, 941 N.E.2d 768.

*234 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Russell S. Bensing, for appellant. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Hodge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-6320, 941 N.E.2d 768.

*234 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Russell S. Bensing, for appellant. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Hodge.

State v. Faraj, 2010 Ohio 6333, 128 Ohio St. 3d 233 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

2010 Ohio 6333 (State v. Faraj) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related