State v. Faraj

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Faraj

2010 Ohio 6333, 128 Ohio St. 3d 233

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 29, 2010

Docket2010-1679

StatusPublished

This text of 2010 Ohio 6333 (State v. Faraj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Faraj, 2010 Ohio 6333, 128 Ohio St. 3d 233 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-6320, 941 N.E.2d 768.

*234 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Russell S. Bensing, for appellant. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Hodge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-6320, 941 N.E.2d 768.

*234 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Russell S. Bensing, for appellant. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Hodge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2010 Ohio 6333, 128 Ohio St. 3d 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-faraj-ohio-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack