State v. Fanniel

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Fanniel

380 S.W.3d 665, 2012 WL 4774511, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 2012·No. No. WD 74035·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre Fanniel appeals from his conviction of first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle. He contends the circuit court plainly erred in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes that was improperly used to show his propensity to commit the charged offense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre Fanniel appeals from his conviction of first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle. He contends the circuit court plainly erred in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes that was improperly used to show his propensity to commit the charged offense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Fanniel, 380 S.W.3d 665, 2012 WL 4774511, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

380 S.W.3d 665 (State v. Fanniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.