State v. Falls

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Falls

DecidedNovember 20, 2013

Docket2013-UP-420

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Falls (State v. Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Falls, (S.C. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Bernard Falls, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-198091

Appeal From Spartanburg County Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-420 Submitted October 1, 2013 – Filed November 20, 2013

AFFIRMED

James P. Craig, of Craig Law Firm, P.C., of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Griffin, 339 S.C. 74, 77, 528 S.E.2d 668, 669 (2000) (stating a ruling in limine is not final and unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling procured, the issue is not preserved for review); State v. King, 349 S.C. 142, 148-50, 561 S.E.2d 640, 643-44 (Ct. App. 2002) (holding the trial court's ruling to deny defendant's motion in limine to suppress drug evidence on the grounds that the search was within the confines of the Fourth Amendment was not preserved for review when defense counsel failed to renew his objection at trial when the drugs were actually entered into evidence).

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Bernard Falls, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-198091

Appeal From Spartanburg County Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-420 Submitted October 1, 2013 – Filed November 20, 2013

AFFIRMED

James P. Craig, of Craig Law Firm, P.C., of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Griffin, 339 S.C. 74, 77, 528 S.E.2d 668, 669 (2000) (stating a ruling in limine is not final and unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling procured, the issue is not preserved for review); State v. King, 349 S.C. 142, 148-50, 561 S.E.2d 640, 643-44 (Ct. App. 2002) (holding the trial court's ruling to deny defendant's motion in limine to suppress drug evidence on the grounds that the search was within the confines of the Fourth Amendment was not preserved for review when defense counsel failed to renew his objection at trial when the drugs were actually entered into evidence).

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Falls, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-falls-scctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack