State v. Falls

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Falls

823 S.W.2d 537, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 286

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 1992·No. Nos. 58843, 60145·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for second degree robbery and first degree tampering and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, [538]*538setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for second degree robbery and first degree tampering and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, [538]*538setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).

State v. Falls, 823 S.W.2d 537, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 286 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 537 (State v. Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.