State v. Faison

193 S.E.2d 116, 17 N.C. App. 168, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1617
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 20, 1972
DocketNo. 724SC645
StatusPublished

This text of 193 S.E.2d 116 (State v. Faison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Faison, 193 S.E.2d 116, 17 N.C. App. 168, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1617 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

Although defendant has filed a motion to withdraw his appeal, we have elected to deny the motion and consider the [169]*169case on its merits. After careful consideration of the record on appeal and the briefs, we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.E.2d 116, 17 N.C. App. 168, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-faison-ncctapp-1972.