State v. Faison
This text of 97 S.E.2d 447 (State v. Faison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence was amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and to sustain the verdict and judgment. We have carefully examined all of defendant’s assignments of error, and all are overruled. The charge has not been brought forward. Therefore, it is presumed that the jury was charged correctly as to the law arising upon the evidence, as required by G.S. 1-180. S. v. Phelps, 242 N.C. 540, 89 S.E. 2d 132. The defendant has failed to show any error or reason sufficient to disturb the trial and judgment below. S. v. Davis, 229 N.C. 386, 50 S.E. 2d 37.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 S.E.2d 447, 246 N.C. 121, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-faison-nc-1957.