State v. Faidy
This text of 919 So. 2d 582 (State v. Faidy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state appeals from the trial court’s order which dismissed a violation of probation proceeding against the defendant, Fai-dy. The trial court apparently concluded it lacked jurisdiction because the affidavit used to secure the arrest warrant for the probation violation was not sworn to under oath before a person authorized to administer oaths, as required by this court in Jackson v. State, 881 So.2d 666 (Fla. 5th DCA2004).
In Crain v. State, 914 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (en banc), we reaffirmed our holding in Jackson that such an affidavit is defective. However, we also explained the defective affidavit does not vitiate the warrant, and dismissal is inappropriate in instances in which the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies. Because the good faith exception may apply here, we summarily reverse the dismissal order and remand for reconsideration in light of Crain.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
919 So. 2d 582, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 201, 2006 WL 64425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-faidy-fladistctapp-2006.