State v. Fabricatore

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Fabricatore

882 A.2d 678, 275 Conn. 902, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 354

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 12, 2005·No. SC 17492·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 729 (AC 23521), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*903 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17492. Decided September 12, 2005 Todd A. Bussert, special public defender, in support of the petition. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s improper instruction on the duty to retreat constituted harmless error?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 729 (AC 23521), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*903 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17492. Decided September 12, 2005 Todd A. Bussert, special public defender, in support of the petition. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s improper instruction on the duty to retreat constituted harmless error?”

State v. Fabricatore, 882 A.2d 678, 275 Conn. 902, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 354 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

882 A.2d 678 (State v. Fabricatore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related