State v. Ezinski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Ezinski

947 So. 2d 690, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 2007 WL 397186

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 2007·No. No. 4D06-2262·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order denying restitution for investigative costs, which consisted of an office manager spending time in order to calculate how much money was stolen from the company. The trial court concluded that office hours spent by the employee were not recoverable. Defendant recognizes, however, that the court was incorrect, but argues in the alternative that the evidence as to the amount of the costs was speculative. We conclude that the evidence was not speculative and accordingly reverse.

STEVENSON, C.J., KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order denying restitution for investigative costs, which consisted of an office manager spending time in order to calculate how much money was stolen from the company. The trial court concluded that office hours spent by the employee were not recoverable. Defendant recognizes, however, that the court was incorrect, but argues in the alternative that the evidence as to the amount of the costs was speculative. We conclude that the evidence was not speculative and accordingly reverse.

STEVENSON, C.J., KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

State v. Ezinski, 947 So. 2d 690, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 2007 WL 397186 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

947 So. 2d 690 (State v. Ezinski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.