State v. Ezequiel R. R.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Ezequiel R. R.

196 A.3d 804, 330 Conn. 945

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 20, 2018·Published

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 184 Conn.App. 55, 194 A.3d 873 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence if the statements are reasonably pertinent to medical diagnosis or treatment, even when the primary purpose of the interview is not to render a medical diagnosis or to provide treatment to the child?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 184 Conn.App. 55, 194 A.3d 873 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence if the statements are reasonably pertinent to medical diagnosis or treatment, even when the primary purpose of the interview is not to render a medical diagnosis or to provide treatment to the child?"

State v. Ezequiel R. R., 196 A.3d 804, 330 Conn. 945 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

196 A.3d 804 (State v. Ezequiel R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related