State v. Ezequiel R. R.
This text of 196 A.3d 804 (State v. Ezequiel R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence if the statements are reasonably pertinent to medical diagnosis or treatment, even when the primary purpose of the interview is not to render a medical diagnosis or to provide treatment to the child?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 A.3d 804, 330 Conn. 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ezequiel-r-r-conn-2018.