Home/Oregon Supreme Court/State v. Ewing

State v. Ewing

149 P.2d 765, 174 Or. 487, 1944 Ore. LEXIS 38
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMay 1, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by46 cases

This text of 149 P.2d 765 (State v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ewing, 149 P.2d 765, 174 Or. 487, 1944 Ore. LEXIS 38 (Or. 1944).

Opinions

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 489 Leland Stanford Ewing was convicted of sustaining osculatory relations with the private parts of a male person, and appeals.

REVERSED. The defendant was tried, found guilty, and sentenced upon an indictment, the charging part of which is as follows:

"`The said Leland Stanford Ewing on the 15th day of September, A.D., 1941 in the said County of Grant and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously and against the order of nature, have a certain venereal affair with a human being, to-wit: W.L. Miller, the said W.L. Miller being a male person, and the said Leland Stanford Ewing, did then and there sustain osculatory relations with the private parts of the said W.L. Miller, and so the said Leland Stanford Ewing did in the manner and form aforesaid, commit and perpetrate the detestable crime of sodomy, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Oregon.'"

Before the trial, the defendant had demurred to the indictment upon the alleged ground that more than one crime was charged therein. The overruling of that demurrer forms the basis upon which defendant makes his first assignment of error in this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Antoine v. Taylor
499 P.3d 48 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2021)
State v. J. C. N.-V.
Oregon Supreme Court, 2016
State v. Ashkins
357 P.3d 490 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Pipkin
316 P.3d 255 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2013)
State v. Burgess
287 P.3d 1093 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2012)
STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. Fitch
84 P.3d 190 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Fitch
84 P.3d 190 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
State v. Randolph
860 P.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Hayes
843 P.2d 948 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. McKay
787 P.2d 479 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Russell
733 P.2d 162 (Utah Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Davis
634 P.2d 279 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)
State v. Swensen
595 P.2d 518 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
State v. Sicks
576 P.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
State v. Henley
557 P.2d 33 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)
State v. Arndt
553 P.2d 1328 (Washington Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. Tippie
517 P.2d 1063 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1973)
State v. Sterling
516 P.2d 87 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1973)
State v. Hazelett
492 P.2d 501 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1972)
State v. Stielow
484 P.2d 214 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 P.2d 765, 174 Or. 487, 1944 Ore. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ewing-or-1944.