State v. Everett

2014 ND 191
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 28, 2014
Docket20140102
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 2014 ND 191 (State v. Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Everett, 2014 ND 191 (N.D. 2014).

Opinion

Filed 10/28/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2014 ND 191

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Tilmer Paul Everett, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20140102

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Dawn M. Deitz, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Tilmer Everett, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506, defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Everett

[¶1] Tilmer Everett appeals from an order denying his petition alleging abuse of process and violation of his due process rights in his conviction for gross sexual imposition.  Everett’s conviction of gross sexual imposition was affirmed in State v. Everett , 2008 ND 126, 756 N.W.2d 344.  The denials of his numerous post-

conviction applications also have been affirmed.   See Everett v. State , 2012 ND 189, 821 N.W.2d 385; Everett v. State , 2011 ND 221, 806 N.W.2d 438; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 226, 795 N.W.2d 37; Everett v. State , 2010 ND 4, 789 N.W.2d 282; Everett v. State , 2008 ND 199, 757 N.W.2d 530.

[¶2] In February 2014, Everett filed this petition alleging abuse of process and denial of his due process rights, contending the district court improperly granted the State’s demand for a change of judge in the early stages of the underlying criminal proceeding.  We affirm the order denying his petition under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6) and (7); see Everett , 2010 ND 4, 789 N.W.2d 282 (res judicata precludes claims or variations of claims raised in previous proceedings, and misuse of process precludes claims that could have been raised in a prior post-conviction proceeding or other proceeding).

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everett v. State
2020 ND 257 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 ND 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-everett-nd-2014.