State v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Evans

861 S.W.2d 214, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1503

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Evans. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1579 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 1993·No. Nos. 61102, 63598·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree assault and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree assault and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

State v. Evans, 861 S.W.2d 214, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1503 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

861 S.W.2d 214 (State v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.