State v. Evans

926 So. 2d 498, 2006 La. LEXIS 1281, 2006 WL 1135529
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 17, 2006·No. No. 2005-KK-2307·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 272060; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 05-184.

Writ granted. Judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s motion to suppress is hereby reinstated. The determination as to whether exigency existed was a factual determination made by the trial court. We find the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress. See State v. Brisban, 2000-3437 (La.2/26/02), 809 So.2d 923.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Evans, 926 So. 2d 498, 2006 La. LEXIS 1281, 2006 WL 1135529 (La. 2006).

926 So. 2d 498 (State v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brisban
809 So. 2d 923 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)