State v. Evans
This text of 388 So. 2d 1104 (State v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee’s motion to suppress contraband. A recitation of the facts in this case is unnecessary because at the hearing on the motion, the State virtually agreed that the motion was well taken. In response to the court’s question as to whether the State concurred in the defendant’s position, the assistant state attorney replied: “Well, based upon the facts that have been put in the record, I believe so. Probably.”
The State may not lead the court to an incorrect conclusion and then be heard to complain that the court erred.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 So. 2d 1104, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-evans-fladistctapp-1980.