State v. Evans

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Evans

388 So. 2d 1104, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17401

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1980·No. No. 80-384·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee’s motion to suppress contraband. A recitation of the facts in this case is unnecessary because at the hearing on the motion, the State virtually agreed that the motion was well taken. In response to the court’s question as to whether the State concurred in the defendant’s position, the assistant state attorney replied: “Well, based upon the facts that have been put in the record, I believe so. Probably.”

The State may not lead the court to an incorrect conclusion and then be heard to complain that the court erred.

AFFIRMED.

MOORE, HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee’s motion to suppress contraband. A recitation of the facts in this case is unnecessary because at the hearing on the motion, the State virtually agreed that the motion was well taken. In response to the court’s question as to whether the State concurred in the defendant’s position, the assistant state attorney replied: “Well, based upon the facts that have been put in the record, I believe so. Probably.”

The State may not lead the court to an incorrect conclusion and then be heard to complain that the court erred.

AFFIRMED.

MOORE, HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

State v. Evans, 388 So. 2d 1104, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17401 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

388 So. 2d 1104 (State v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related